Election Fraud

“It’s not happening, but it’s good that it is.” “Liberals demand endless evidence to believe the truth, and zero evidence to believe a lie”.

Let me start off by reminding you that if you believe the 2020 election was stolen, then you are an ignorant racist moron prone to conspiracy theories. The only proper election that was ever stolen was the 2016 election that was stolen by the Russians. I know this to be true because Hillary Clinton told me so.

Like the movie “Men In Black”, look into the little red light and forget what happened after the 2000 election when Democrats were convinced that Al Gore had the election stolen by George W. Bush.

The Democrats may have been right to protest. After all, the Immigration and Naturalization Service (I.N.S.) had been trying to naturalize as many foreigners as possible knowing that they vote overwhelmingly Democrat starting in 1996:

“The Justice Department’s internal watchdog, however, found that at least one aide to Vice President Al Gore had pressed for the speeding up of naturalizations in part to gain electoral advantage, although it called the aide’s influence on the program ‘indirect.’”

By legalizing all these people, the Democrats thought they had the election in the bag. So, what went wrong? Could it be the Diebold (Global Election Systems or GES) was the problem? At one point, the machines gave Al Gore -16,022 votes. That’s right, a negative amount. Oh but, it was just a little glitch. Nothing to see here, move along.

There was a documentary by HBO (not a bastion of conservatives) called “Hacking Democracy” (2006) that pointed out the flaws in machine voting.

In the wake of the 2020 “Most secure election ever” somewhat amazingly, HBO revisited the subject again in “Kill Chain: The Cyber War on America’s Elections”.

Harri Hursti was interviewed for both of HBO’s documentaries. For the second documentary, the link is above because it’s on Rumble.

Yes, foreign governments do have an incentive to hack into our elections and change the outcome. In fact, if you have a Spotify account, you can listen to Sharyl Attkisson’s interview of Ralph Pezzullo and Gary Berntsen on their explosive book, “Stolen Elections: The Takedown of Democracies Worldwide.” (Actually, if you don’t have a Spotify account, it may be able to play for you anyway here. Just click on the green play button). Lara Logan also interviewed the two authors and her interview is much longer and she failed to answer one simple question that Sharyl Attkisson did, “If the election was being rigged, how did Trump win the 2024 election?” According to the pair, they had briefed the Trump campaign on the threat and someone (Elon Musk?) had blocked the servers in Serbia they were using to rig the 2024 election. As a result, Trump was able to win every single swing state.

For those who don’t know, Gary Berntsen was the C.I.A.’s first man on the ground in Afghanistan after the 9/11/2001 attacks. Berntsen and Pezzullo wrote a book about it called “Jawbreaker: The Attack on Bin Laden and Al-Qaeda”. (Because the interviews are so long, I play solitaire while listening, keeps me from going stir crazy).

In the wake of the 2020 election and all the suspicious things that happened, Sharyl Attkisson compiled a list of “Hard-to-find 2020 election fraud stories and links”. She realized Big Tech was working hard to bury the truth.

Here are my previous two articles on whether or not foreigners are voting in our elections. First here, second here. (I don’t know why the second article has more views than the first, but it does. The important thing in both articles are more my links that I put in there).

I can remember when I was in the Border Patrol doing research on a Resident Alien suspected of harboring and employing illegal aliens. One of the computer databases we were using (it may have been Accurint) listed the suspect as a registered Democrat. Now, being a Resident Alien (Lawfully Approved for Permanent Residency L.A.P.R.) does allow you to be in the United States, but it does NOT allow you to vote. I had to turn that case over to I.C.E and I never found out what became of it.

In any case, when someone tries to tell you that our elections are secure and that you are a heartless cold racist for daring to question the virtue of our election integrity, you can either refer them to this article, or, look at some of the links in my articles for proof that they are anything but secure.

======

I wrote the above as something of a conglomeration of articles on stolen elections for my own reference. However, after writing that for substack, I came across still more articles on “It’s not happening and it’s good that it is.” Here’s Sharyl Attkisson’s substack on “Miami’s Absentee and Mail-In Ballot Fraud“. She points out there was an election in 1997 in Miami between Republican Mayor Joe Carollo and Democrat Xavier Suarez. Suarez cheated to win. He actually took office, but then lost the lawsuit and was kicked out of office.

Here is a Townhall article with Kamala Harris talking about the need for paper ballots to prevent cheating. The idiot probably didn’t realize it was her side doing all of the cheating, or, if she’s smart enough to know, then she was trying to cover for it.

Perhaps most surprisingly for my liberal relatives, did you know that Nina Totenberg of NPR has a sister who is a judge? I bet you didn’t know that, I didn’t know that. More surprisingly, did you know that Nina’s sister is able to be something called “impartial”, and to set aside her liberal biases when making a court ruling? Yet, she did! See here.

“Judge Totenberg is no conservative. She is a Democrat appointed by Barack Obama. She is the sister of longtime liberal NPR legal correspondent Nina Totenberg. Yet her October 11, 2020, Opinion and Order contains some of the most devastating judicial findings ever written about the reliability of Dominion’s QR-code-based ballot-marking devices.

The core problem Totenberg identified is simple and profound: voters never get to verify the votes that are actually counted.

She wrote that ‘the tabulation of the vote is actually based on the ballot’s non-encrypted QR barcode on the ballot—designed to summarize the voter’s ballot selections in code—that by itself is not voter reviewable or verifiable.’ The human-readable text on the paper is irrelevant. The scanner ‘tabulates the ballot votes solely based on the QR code—and not based on the human readable text on the printed ballot.’”